Thursday, February 21, 2008

A day in the life of a 207 driver



It’s 6:00am and 47 degrees below zero, time to get ready for work. After hitting the coffee really hard and getting dressed for the elements you head outside to start your snow machine. As you walk out the door you realize how cold it is as the -47 degree air enters your lungs.

After a nice ride to the airport you start your preflight:
· Digging the aircraft out of last night’s snow drifts.
· Sweeping the snow off of the plane.
· Running back to the hanger to warm my hands, it’s so cold that after 15 minutes your hands start to hurt even with the best gloves on.
· Firing up the “Herman Nelson” heater to heat the engine and then the avionics. If you are interested in finding out what a “Herman Nelson” is you can view at http://www.herman-nelson.com/
· Fuel the aircraft – At these temps you have a high risk of static electricity so extra perceptions must be taken, put out your smoke J
· Now you’re ready to start the engine and allow for a full warm up without high RPM’s as you can crack the cylinders at this temp.
· Now that the warm up is complete you can put the engine blanket ( http://www.kennoncovers.com/enginecovers.htm ) on the aircraft to keep the heat in and also plug the aircrafts external oil heater in.

Now you are ready to get your manifest and determine if you are flying passengers or freight. If you are flying freight you will need to head back into the cold to remove your seats from your aircraft.

Ready to go but the temp and weather are not on your side, the temp has only climbed to -45 degrees and you are restricted from flying at anything under -40 due to the company SOP. The ATIS is calling the Visibility at ¼ mile and Ice Fog, looks like it’s time to hurry up and wait.

10:00 am – The temp is @ -39 and the ATIS is calling the weather at 500FT and ½ mile visibility, you are good to go. Now you get your passengers loaded, give a quick preflight briefing (Buckle up and Shut up) and call ground for a special VFR. Once you have your clearance you proceed down to the taxiway to the line of aircraft waiting to get out. Looks like this is going to take a while, you have 3 inbound IFR planes that take priority.

Finally you get your clearance and you are off, it’s only 15 minutes to your first stop and it appears it’s going to be a great day for flying in Western Alaska. Time to call the village agent to get updated weather for your first stop. You turn on the marine band VHF in your aircraft and you hear a lot of village chat (Most village households have a VHF radio in the house for communicating with other people in the village) so you wait your turn, Once you get in contact with the agent you ask about the weather and you are informed that it’s not good. Hmmm, what does “Not Good” mean for landing? You ask if he can see the airport from your location and he replies, NO. Time to go and look for yourself. Well he is correct, you are looking at ice fog that appears to go to ground level around the village. Your only option is to turn back or create your own instrument approach with your onboard GPS, risky business for even the more experienced bush pilot.

After deciding on the second option you get lined up on final and start your decent, 500ft – 400ft – 300ft and still no sign of the airport, you decide to give it another 100ft and then out of nowhere you spot the little gravel strip, what a relief.

After offloading the passengers and loading 1200lbs of freight yourself you repeat this process over and over again until your day is finally done. Your days ends with 7.5 hours of flight time after spending 13 hours on duty.

Now it’s time for a few beers with friends, a snow machine ride and off to bed so you can repeat this process again the next day.

Flying in the bush is very hard work with a lot of risk but the reward far exceeded. You will see scenery that people only dream of, work with great people from a very close community and provide a very essential service to remote Alaska.

FAA Alaska Weather Cams

Folks, this is a great way to get real-time conditions and your destination and along the route before you burn fuel. I would recommend this site to all Alaska Pilots.
http://akweathercams.faa.gov/

Are ramp checks ramping up?

There has been an increasing number of calls lately to the AOPA Pilot Information Center from members who have been "ramp checked." So should you be concerned?
"Nobody likes being ramp checked, but the regulations do allow FAA inspectors to do it at their discretion," said Woody Cahall, AOPA vice president of aviation services. "But a ramp check doesn't have to be particularly painful if you understand the rules and exercise some common sense."
Cahall noted that ramp checks are part of the FAA's normal surveillance activities and that the agency seems to be increasing the use of this particular enforcement tool in some areas of the country.
An FAA inspector may decide to check you and your aircraft because he's observed something unsafe, or it may simply be a random check. You can expect that an inspector will show you his identification and ask to see your pilot and medical certificates.
"Think about how you would react to a police officer and a traffic stop," said Cahall. "When he says 'license and registration, please,'" you know that a polite response and a cooperative attitude goes a long way toward minimizing any hassles."
The regulations require that your pilot and medical certificates be readily available, and you should be willing to show them. The inspector can examine your certificates, but he can't keep them. If he asks you to "surrender" your certificates, politely decline and contact an aviation attorney.
What other paperwork can he look at? Remember AR[R]OW for the documents required on board the aircraft?
Airworthiness certificate;
Aircraft Registration;
Operating handbook or flight manual; and
Weight and balance data are all required to be in the aircraft.
But you don't have to have your logbooks — pilot or aircraft — in the airplane. There are reasons why you wouldn't want to carry them with you, and why you should keep your logs in a safe place.
"Losing aircraft logs can significantly reduce the value of an aircraft," said Cahall. "And if you lose your pilot log, it can be very difficult to reconstruct it to prove currency, time to be applied toward ratings, etc."
The regulations don't require that you keep logs with you, only that they be made available upon the reasonable request of an authorized FAA agent. So the inspector can ask to see your logs, and you can legally tell him, "They're at home. Do you want to schedule a time for me to bring them to you?"
The inspector can board the aircraft, but not without your knowledge and consent. He can inspect the exterior and look through windows.
Finally, be cooperative, but don't volunteer information. Remember what they say on Law and Order — anything you say can be used against you.
For more information, see AOPA Online's subject report "Ramp Checks." Pilots should also consider AOPA's Legal Services Plan should they need an attorney to represent them against an FAA enforcement action.

Handheld GPS - Looking for feedback on my next purchase

I have been using the Garmin 296 for 3 years now and really love the unit but it's time for me to look at upgrading. Currently the features of the 396 look great but don't really provide much benefit for us pilots in Alaska. Any suggestions on what to go with?

Capstone - Air Traffic Control's Evolution

Stephen Beck, a pilot for Grant Aviation, is flying one of three Cessna 207s making the short hop from Bethel, Alaska, northeast to the Eskimo village of Akiak. One of the other Stationairs climbed 500 feet above him, and then passed a mile off to his left.
Because of his Cessna's high wing, Beck couldn't see the other airplane until it pulled ahead of him. But he watched it overtake him on the UPS Aviation Technologies (UPSAT) MX20 color multifunction display (MFD) in his panel.
All three 207s have what appear to be off-the-shelf UPSAT avionics packages, including a GX60 GPS/com and an MX20. Not visible, however, is the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) datalink radio that, in a process called automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B), transmits each aircraft's altitude and GPS-derived position. That information is displayed on MFDs in similarly equipped aircraft, as well as on air traffic controllers' radar displays.
The U.S. air traffic control system of 10 to 15 years from now may bear little resemblance to the ATC system in which we operate today. But pilots who fly regularly in the system may not notice that it's changing.
That's because the FAA is planning a series of small changes, each of which should bring incremental benefits to most�if not all�users. Although many of these system changes will be subtle, their combined effect could be considerable.
Several anticipated system improvements, including ADS-B, are being demonstrated in Alaska, where the FAA and industry partners hosted an open house in August for the Capstone program. Capstone is a joint industry and FAA Alaskan Region effort to improve aviation safety by installing new avionics in 150 participating air carrier aircraft, mostly single-engine planes flying for FAR Part 135 air taxis that seldom stray from the remote Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of southwestern Alaska. Capstone's technologies also show promise for increasing the efficiency and capacity of the air traffic system. The demonstration is centered around Bethel, population 5,471, from whose airport these air taxis distribute people and cargo�delivered primarily from Anchorage by Part 121 air carriers�to 56 villages. Bethel Airport has no radar service (although there is a contract air traffic control tower), and most carriers' operations are limited to VFR.
Another operational evaluation of ADS-B technology will be held in Louisville, Kentucky, later this month, and one of AOPA's two Capstone-equipped aircraft may participate. AOPA will be evaluating the technology at its Frederick, Maryland, headquarters this fall.
FAA Administrator Jane Garvey said in a press release that Capstone is instrumental in reaching the agency's goal of reducing the accident rate for all sectors of aviation by 80 percent by the year 2007. "These technologies will help us address two key safety priorities at the FAA�controlled flight into terrain [CFIT] and runway safety," she said. The accident rate for air taxis and general aviation in Alaska is three times the overall U.S. rate, and the fatality rate is almost double.
Pilots using the Capstone equipment, which already has been installed in 55 of the 150 aircraft, seem to appreciate the CFIT function. Runway incursions are a more recent FAA emphasis (see "Crossing the Line"), but Capstone users were much more interested in the potential for radarlike air traffic control services, moving maps, near-real-time Nexrad weather radar images, and new GPS approaches into airfields that previously were accessible only in visual meteorological conditions.
For many Alaskan pilots, considering the kind of flying they do and the Spartan avionics in many of their airplanes, just knowing the GPS groundspeed is a significant operational advantage. "I've been in a DC�3 making 60 kt over the ground, and your fuel just doesn't hold out if you've planned for a significantly faster groundspeed," commented Tom Wardleigh, chairman of the Alaskan Aviation Safety Foundation.
Alaska has extreme weather conditions that can change rapidly�which is a liability when you depend on air transportation. "For those of us who live in Alaska, aviation safety is an almost daily concern," said Lee Gorsuch, chancellor of the University of Alaska-Anchorage. "We fly a lot, and in many cases we don't have a choice."
"Our emphasis on safety needs to be changed," Wardleigh added. "When you honor a pilot who is �the only one able to make it through the pass VFR,' you're sending the wrong message. Technology has improved tremendously over the years. What hasn't changed is the unreasonable demand of the American public for aviation services."
Shaping the future
Steven J. Brown, FAA associate administrator for air traffic services and former AOPA senior vice president of government and technical affairs, said that tomorrow's air traffic control will be shaped by the airlines' future requirements. "Right now those are anything but clear," he said. "From an IFR perspective, I think the real wild card is how [airline] passenger demand is going to develop."
Three possible scenarios exist, Brown said. There could be more intense hubbing and banking of flights, and busy airports and airspace continue to be busy. Or airlines will develop strategies in which they bypass major hubs, perhaps using medium hubs as an alternative. The least likely scenario is that passengers become disaffected and travel less.
"I think we'll see more development of medium hubs�the major hubs can't get much busier," he said. Airline activity at cities like Dayton, Ohio; Jacksonville, Florida; and Milwaukee could increase under this scenario, he explained. "There will be more terminal airspace around to accommodate increasing passenger travel." While this scenario could be more troubling to general aviation, because of increased interaction with commercial traffic, he doesn't think that the adjustment will be impossible.
Other changes will be more widespread. "I think that in the next 10 years, certainly, we'll see the automation systems in ATC supporting flight-plan filing and direct GPS routings," Brown said. "That will accommodate requests for direct routings even in times of high traffic volume." More distinct altitude stratification is already appearing, with the introduction of a new low-altitude en route structure from about Flight Level 220 to FL320, primarily for regional aircraft.
VFR flying will essentially be unchanged, Brown said, with robust GPS providing enhanced positional awareness. A two-way datalink system could simplify communications. "There will probably be a skeletal network of ground-based navaids," he added, mentioning VORs and loran.
Brown sees Capstone's primary contributions to this future as terrain and traffic. "That's what it's really built around. It becomes really compelling when you have this real-time terrain database. The corollary benefit is the multifunction displays�all kinds of new applications will become available [for them]."
Steve Creamer, air traffic manager for the Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control Center, suggested a few other ways in which technology might improve flying and flight safety: ground-to-air datalinking of notams and weather updates; eliminating frequency changes, including those for obtaining ASOS and AWOS information or activating pilot-controlled lighting; and more active flight service monitoring of aircraft on VFR flight plans.
Creamer is enthusiastic about ADS-B. "It's a great complement to radar in areas where radar coverage doesn't exist," he said. "We're looking at ADS-B to provide surveillance down into fjords where radar wouldn't do you any good anyway." Some in the industry have speculated that ADS-B could one day allow pilots flying IFR to separate themselves from other traffic, and eliminate the need for en route ATC radar.
Implementation of these technologies will involve incremental steps, each providing more information�"which I think is beneficial, even though it's not 100 percent," Brown said. "Too often in aviation I think we let the best become an enemy to the good." In other words, aviation passes up good systems that provide tangible benefits while it seeks the perfect solution.
The word on the street
Talks with several Alaskan pilots who have flown the Capstone-equipped aircraft indicate a generally high level of acceptance, although some had suggestions for improvements.
"It's a heck of a nice GPS," said Tom Ratledge, a pilot for Yukon Air, which has installed the equipment in two Cessna 207s and a Cessna 185 on floats�half of its fleet. He particularly appreciates the terrain warning function, and said that the traffic advisories will be nice once all aircraft are equipped. "You've got to remind yourself to look out the window," Ratledge said. "You may have three on the TV, but you have to look for the ones that aren't."
ADS-B data is not yet being used to control air traffic in Alaska. The data has been successfully integrated with traditional radar at Anchorage Center, and it should be used to control live traffic early next year. Likewise, a cable carrying a feed of ADS-B data has been run into the tower at Bethel Airport, but the data will not be displayed until some operational issues are resolved.
When the ceilings are down, IFR operations tie up the whole airport, Ratledge explained, and it's difficult for controllers to fit in special VFR operations. "It would help if we could speed them along a little. It's not so much that we have a day [of low weather]�we have three or four days in a row." Under those conditions, he said, special VFR traffic spends so much time waiting to depart�or holding until it can return�that pilots might fly an hour or an hour and a half per day, instead of a more normal six or seven hours.
"A lot of the people who are brand-new here like [the equipment]," said Ken Wallace, who has been flying for Grant Aviation for three and a half years. "It helps them learn the area." But Wallace finds the equipment distracting and its self-tests annoying. "Most days I'm pushing 25 or 30 takeoffs and landings. If I have to wait five minutes [for the equipment to test itself] before each one, I'm not going to get anything done."
Wallace also was concerned about the partial equipage of Bethel operators, a situation that will improve as the avionics are installed in more aircraft. "It's neat and all, but unless every aircraft is equipped, it's useless information." Officials said that avionics were being installed in the 95 remaining aircraft as quickly as aircraft schedules and limited radio-shop capacity would allow.
Pilot Stephen Beck said that the MX20's display is "really good." He also figured out a way to save some time when the GPS performs its self-test, averaging a minute and a half, after startup�he pushes keys to skip the system's IFR tests, because he's flying VFR anyway.
The Alaskan Aviation Safety Foundation is supportive of the Capstone initiative, despite the foundation's own areas of concern. "For those people who are inclined to cheat, we're giving them the burglar's tool kit," said AASF's Wardleigh. "But for the others, it's a great safety tool."
"The problem with any technology out here is convincing pilots that the gizmo is not flying the airplane," added Ginny Hyatt, the foundation's secretary.
What's next?
Does Capstone have a future beyond Bethel and the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta? Capstone's charter was to "conduct experiments for the benefit of aviation within the State of Alaska," said Pat Poe, the FAA's Alaskan Region administrator. Poe then quoted a statement by Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens: "We're going to go as far as safety permits and money allows." But it's not about what the FAA thinks, Poe added. "It's what the pilots think, and what they can demonstrate with [the technology]."
The datalink radio could change from the UAT before Capstone technologies are expanded outside of Alaska. "We don't know which datalink [technology] is going to be in the final National Airspace System decision," said John Hallinan, Capstone program manager. "Capstone picked its datalink through the old-fashioned bidding process."
Capstone equipment has been installed in less than half of the participating aircraft, and ADS-B has not yet been used to control traffic in Alaska. The University of Alaska-Anchorage and the FAA both will study Capstone's results. Alaskans will consider the demonstration successful if it shows a reduction in the aircraft accident rate.
Links to additional information about the Capstone demonstration and future avionics can be found on AOPA Online (www.aopa.org/pilots/links/links0010.shtml). E-mail the author at mike.collins@aopa.org.

Frontier and Hageland join forces

Frontier and Hageland join forcesTwo major carriers partner for smoother rides
By Rob Stapleton Alaska Journal of Commerce

When Bob Hajdukovich, director of operations for Frontier Flying Service, picked up the tow bar on the nose wheel of a Hageland Aviation Service's Beechcraft 1900 and positioned it on the company's aircraft tug earlier this month, it signaled a new era for the Alaska aviation industry.
Two of Alaska's top air carriers, Hageland Aviation Services Inc. and Frontier Flying Service, signed an agreement on Jan. 14 to operate under a single holding company under the name FrontierAlaska, effective March 1.
Hageland and Frontier call it the “Combining of Forces.” The combination signals potential changes in the future of carriers operating in rural Alaska.
“We are watching the Hageland-Frontier deal real closely,” said Kevin Adams, with the U.S. Department of Transportation, the government agency responsible for certifying airlines.
Joining forces will make the team the largest commuter airline carrier in Alaska. Hajdukovich will act as its president.
It is not a merger, but is the creation of a holding company that allows the two carriers to operate independently in a partnership agreement. The two airlines agreed not to duplicate flight service destinations into rural Alaska and will use a common ticketing and reservation set-up, referred to as code sharing.
Frontier will operate the routes into the main hubs with larger airplanes and Hageland will operate into rural areas with smaller aircraft, said Mike Hageland. “Each will operate in areas where we have infrastructure.”
“Even if it means shutting down a building that we don't need because of duplication, that's still an overall savings,” Hajdukovich said.
Industry officials have long predicted that a merger or a combination of airlines to cover villages and service to rural Alaska hubs may be more cost effective.
“We have been competing in the same markets and this will allow us to use our assets more effectively,” Hajdukovich said.
The deal has an immediate downside. In shared markets, the new company will take a loss of 15 percent in carrying U.S. mail.
But once combined, Hageland will be paid a higher rate to move mail in some markets, and benefits from Frontier's passenger enplanement history, numbers that are key to getting independent shares of mail.
The biggest reason for combining the two airlines is adaptability, Hajdukovich said.
“We are taking best types of aircraft and putting them into the markets that make the most economic sense to use, “ he said.
The two airlines will continue to operate as two separate companies, according to Hajdukovich and Hageland. Both said there would be no major management changes at either airline.
“Where we can find common synergies, we going to find the best ways to handle them and affect them,” Hajdukovich said.
Hageland and Frontier have been in fierce competition in Aniak, Kotzebue, Nome and Barrow for the last two years. Hageland said combining forces will help both airlines.
“Really, the only areas that will be affected are Aniak, Kotzebue, Nome, and Barrow, where we will meld the two airlines together to make one good one,” Hageland said.
Both company Web sites will have the logo and a connection to the FrontierAlaska site, which will offer reservations and ticketing on both airlines.
“If you go to the FrontierAlaska Web site you can book a flight from Anchorage to Hooper Bay. On the tickets it will say Anchorage to Bethel, Frontier Flying Service, and Bethel to Hooper Bay will be on Hageland aircraft,” Hajdukovich said.
Passenger ease and flight transition are on the minds of both airlines.
“We can feed the Anchorage and Fairbanks traffic right from our terminal,” Hageland said. “We will share terminal and ramp space where it makes sense.”
Neither have ruled out combining the operations under the holding company, but only if it makes sense.
“We will have to transition, not immediately but through a lot of discussion and strategy,” Hajdukovich said. “This is a game of survival. When the first thing you get is less mail and less revenue you better start figuring things out pretty quickly.”

Source :http://www.alaskajournal.com/stories/012708/tra_20080127001.shtml